"Back in the early 1970s, in an effort to break the cycles of starvation in the Turkana region, Kenyan officials had delegated the Norwegian development agency Norad the task of retraining local herders to fish. The lake swarmed with tilapia and Nile perch. The idea was to wean the people off their boom-and-bust livestock economy, swap animal for fish protein, and make the nomads productive, sedentary citizens. The Scandinavians built a modern freezer plant near the lake. They taught people how to cast nets. And they distributed 20 large, modern fiberglass skiffs. The project was a colossal failure. As it turned out, freezing the catches cost more than the fish were worth. And, astoundingly, the foreigners hadn't bothered to ask whether the milk- and meat-addicted nomads even liked fish. (They didn't.) A decade after donors had sunk millions into the scheme, the Turkana pastoralists were as poor and hungry as ever. Many gave up and returned to the bush. A few of the more enterprising families found a novel use for their upturned fishing vessels as crude shelters.
Lake Turkana's beached fishing fleet became an icon of asinine philanthropy in Africa."
-Paul Salopek, The Last Famine
We need to analyze what went wrong with this program, what were the structural deficits that created failure, not just for the project, but for the intended beneficiaries, as well as the Kenyan State, whose social contract with these nomadic tribes was thus eroded. A few superficial critiques of the program....
Program Design: participatory in nature? I think not...
Delegation of Program Responsibility: Is the Norweigan government better able to design and implement a program for nomads in Kenya than Kenyans in Nairobi are? Increased geographic distancing=increased chances for failure.
Focus on "Nomadic Productivity:" How can we learn/understanding that certain lifestyles are simply not conducive, in their traditional form, to integration into the wider, globalized economy? How can we understand/learn that pushing this integration will lead to greater failure, domination by power, and, if "successful," only succeeds in bringing people onto the lowest rungs of development while stripping their cultural identity and community bonds?
Modern Freezer Plant: A great symbol/metaphor for the imposition of inappropriate technology upon unwilling recipients; the vestiges of these projects dominate the landscape of so many LDC's....
and so much more....
Lake Turkana's beached fishing fleet became an icon of asinine philanthropy in Africa."
-Paul Salopek, The Last Famine
We need to analyze what went wrong with this program, what were the structural deficits that created failure, not just for the project, but for the intended beneficiaries, as well as the Kenyan State, whose social contract with these nomadic tribes was thus eroded. A few superficial critiques of the program....
Program Design: participatory in nature? I think not...
Delegation of Program Responsibility: Is the Norweigan government better able to design and implement a program for nomads in Kenya than Kenyans in Nairobi are? Increased geographic distancing=increased chances for failure.
Focus on "Nomadic Productivity:" How can we learn/understanding that certain lifestyles are simply not conducive, in their traditional form, to integration into the wider, globalized economy? How can we understand/learn that pushing this integration will lead to greater failure, domination by power, and, if "successful," only succeeds in bringing people onto the lowest rungs of development while stripping their cultural identity and community bonds?
Modern Freezer Plant: A great symbol/metaphor for the imposition of inappropriate technology upon unwilling recipients; the vestiges of these projects dominate the landscape of so many LDC's....
and so much more....
